
Quality, Bias, and Integrity in Pain Research: Creating the Next Generation of Pain Science
-
Register
- Non-member - $25
- Member - Free!
- Retired - Free!
- Trainee - Free!
- Life Member - Free!
- Life Honorary - Free!
- Honorary - Free!
Produced by IASP's Methodology, Evidence Synthesis, and Implementation Special Interest Group (MESISIG), this webinar took place on 20 April 2023.
This webinar, using systematic review as a reference, highlighted how biased and poor-quality primary studies can lead to misleading claims for efficacy and safety in pain treatment and that - beyond bias - there is a growing awareness regarding the importance of research integrity and of challenges that impact upon the trustworthiness of clinical evidence. These proceedings reported on:
1) How to understand quality in both primary research and systematic review.
2) How spin (i.e., misdirection) and diversion occur.
3) The current state of scientific retractions in pain literature; and
4) How we might explore the trustworthiness of pain evidence.
Participants included:
- Andrew Moore, DPhil, DSc, CChem FRSC, University of Oxford, UK; Quality and Bias in Clinical Pain Science
- Emma Fisher, PhD, University of Bath, UK; Research Integrity I: Spin and Diversion in Pain Science
- Michael Ferraro, PhD Candidate, Centre for Pain IMPACT at NeuRA, Sydney, Australia; Research Integrity II: Retraction and its Causes in Pain Science
- Neil O'Connell, PhD, Brunel University, UK; Research Integrity III: Exploring Divergent Results Through an Integrity Lens
- Sebastian Straube, BM BCh, MA (Oxon), DPhil, University of Alberta, Canada; Reflections and Practical Strategies to Develop Cultures of Integrity
- Amanda Williams, PhD, CPsychol, University College London, UK (facilitator)
Key:




